Deck Results
Guest view only

Legacy v3 Group 7DFFC9 (Infernal Tutor, Ad Nauseam) ⤴ Share image

Legacy Last 7 days v3_fpg:7dffc9b233f244 auto group
0Decks in Window
0Tournaments
Record Win Rate
Actual Match WR
Actual Game WR
Best Rank
— Adjusted WR (90d)
— Cut conversion
— Strength · how it works 0 full-field decks · 0 top-32 decks · 0 other
Spread (median rogueness)
$0.00Consensus 75 Price · 0/0 copies priced

Metagame Share Trend

Each point is this archetype's share of all Legacy decks over the previous 7 days latest 0.0% (1468 decks in window) peak 0.0% on 2026-10-27 +0.0 pp since 2026-10-27

0%25%50%75%100%
Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 02
7-day metagame share 0.0

Signature Cards

CardDecksShareAvg Copies
Ad Nauseam {3}{B}{B} $8.48 25 100.0% 0.96
Beseech the Mirror {1}{B}{B}{B} $17.00 25 100.0% 1.72
Duress {B} $0.01 25 100.0% 3.08
Gaea's Will $0.02 25 100.0% 0.88
Infernal Tutor {1}{B} $0.15 25 100.0% 4.0
Tendrils of Agony {2}{B}{B} $0.10 25 100.0% 1.0
Dark Ritual {B} $2.00 25 100.0% 4.0
Lion's Eye Diamond {0} $719.99 25 100.0% 4.0
Lotus Petal {0} $24.00 25 100.0% 4.0
Thoughtseize {B} $4.98 25 100.0% 3.44
Chrome Mox {0} $150.00 22 88.0% 2.52
Brainstorm {U} $0.01 19 76.0% 3.04

Colors

ColorDecks

Consensus 75

0 source decks 0 main 0 sideboard $0.00 current botbox price

Each first, second, third, and fourth copy is ranked independently by prevalence, then the top 60 main-deck and 15 sideboard slots are selected. This keeps the aggregate exactly deck-sized without rounding averages.

Main Deck · $0.00

QtyCardCopy PrevalenceUnit Price

Sideboard · $0.00

QtyCardCopy PrevalenceUnit Price

Consensus Price History

180 days

Read-only composite of the selected consensus printing IDs against botbox historical nonfoil TCGplayer prices. Changing this chart never changes the main pricing tables.

No historical prices are available for the selected consensus printings.

Matchups

Regular includes all recorded non-bye archetype-vs-archetype matches. Draws are discarded and mirror matches are never counted.

No recorded archetype-vs-archetype matches for this mode yet.

Card Usage

Inclusion and copies are rogueness-weighted (a deck counts for 1 − rogueness, so stock lists weigh more); raw counts shown beneath. The consensus list itself is never weighted.

CardBoardDecksInclusionAvg / DeckAvg When PlayedRole

Recent Decks

Showing 0 of 0
DeckTournamentDateRankRecordColorsRogue
Top